CoolDictionary.com Webster Dictionary with PRONUNCIATION and Sound!

How does ESL 57 stack up against other classic modern speakers like Maggie, Martin Logan, Apogee, etc

 
 
   

Question: How does ESL 57 stack up against other classic modern speakers like Maggie, Martin Logan, Apogee, etc

Answer: Quad's ESL 57 does not compare. They sound very -different- than any other electrodynamic speaker. I think they sound different because they are pure. It actually is nothing more than the music you hear. Other system make you listen to music >coming out of a speaker<. I am not going to talk technicalities here, and enough trying to describe how they sound, others will probably do.

I will rather tell you how I feel about Quad ESL, if you are interested, in 3 easy steps;

It took me several years, yes years, to get used to mines. I got the full set almost 20 years ago, with ModII amps and the old tube preamp which I later replaced by the Quad 22 preamp. At the time I was mostly listening to pop music, on expensive crappo Technics-Sony-JVC and the like stuff, fitted with graph EQ and noise reduction boxes, but now I know I was only tapping my feets to the beat of "Slade" and "Supertramp" I was raging trying to adjust those 3 filters knobs on the Quad preamp, and got tired of getting up at every song to "correct" what was perfect. I ended up leaving them at zero, because I figured that something was wrong with my ears, not with the system.

The first step was to clean my ears of years of incorrect reproduction!

That Quad stuff also actually helped and contributed to my musical education; This sytem makes you want to try what you would never listen to, just for the sake of hearing what it's like. Is it a coincidence that I registered at two different libraries to rent discs soon after I got it ? I used to randomly pick records, at the surprise of the clerck. I remember at a certain time I explored contemporary music, and altho most peoples would tell you that Oskar Salla and his "Mixtur Traumatorn" (kinda like the Diplodocus of synthesizers, circa 1950 AD) is only a collection of screeching noises, it was, and still is, music to me. Then I turned to Jazz, because after understanding that -sound- is only part of the whole thing, I had to "tune" my ear to more -sensible- harmonies. Then came classical, industrial, opera, ambiant, bluegrass, electrobody, diphonic, speed-trash-metal, Baroque, and the list goes on and on, and will never stop.

That's the second step, opening my ears, it is still going on nowadays!

Now the fun part; I only have goosebumps at live events or when listening to my Quad system. A friend of mine, who records silence in churches with a Nagra and a Neumann mike told me, when listening to the tape, that he was hearing God. He's a Mystic yes, I admit, but it is not a joke. My cat looked at the ceiling for the birds she was hearing, not at the speakers. Altho one of my bass elements is defective, I still -enjoy- the whole thing. People used to ask, looking at the ESLs "Why do you have two old and ugly electric heaters in this room ?" You can't put them in a corner, or against a wall. After a decade, I stopped touching the volume knob. I can't (I tried hard tho) listen to the TV sound on Quad. It doesn't work, I'm distracted by the moving images I see.

This is the third step: the magic. I can't find any better word to describe it.

Quad cleans, opens, and mesmerizes ears.

Submit Your Own Answer!

Google





 
 
| Home | English Course Questions | English Grammar Questions | Teaching Esl Questions | Esl Exercise Questions | Esl General Questions | Esl How To Questions | Esl Learning Questions | Esl Lessons Questions | Esl Other Languages | Esl Pronounciation Questions | Learning Sign Language Questions | Esl Worksheets Questions | Esl Adult Questions | Esl Beginner Questions | Conversational English Questions | Site Map |